|
In mathematics, the attractor of a random dynamical system may be loosely thought of as a set to which the system evolves after a long enough time. The basic idea is the same as for a deterministic dynamical system, but requires careful treatment because random dynamical systems are necessarily non-autonomous. This requires one to consider the notion of a pullback attractor or attractor in the pullback sense. ==Set-up and motivation== Consider a random dynamical system on a complete separable metric space , where the noise is chosen from a probability space with base flow . A naïve definition of an attractor for this random dynamical system would be to require that for any initial condition , as . This definition is far too limited, especially in dimensions higher than one. A more plausible definition, modelled on the idea of an omega-limit set, would be to say that a point lies in the attractor if and only if there exists an initial condition , there is a sequence of times such that : as . This is not too far from a working definition. However, we have not yet considered the effect of the noise , which makes the system non-autonomous (i.e. it depends explicitly on time). For technical reasons, it becomes necessary to do the following: instead of looking seconds into the "future", and considering the limit as , one "rewinds" the noise seconds into the "past", and evolves the system through seconds using the same initial condition. That is, one is interested in the pullback limit :. So, for example, in the pullback sense, the omega-limit set for a (possibly random) set is the random set : Equivalently, this may be written as : Importantly, in the case of a deterministic dynamical system (one without noise), the pullback limit coincides with the deterministic forward limit, so it is meaningful to compare deterministic and random omega-limit sets, attractors, and so forth. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Pullback attractor」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|